Politics of Creativity

What is the purpose of art? What does it mean to be creative?

I keep dancing around this topic and this week, when divides are deeper that I can remember, I realized something.

There are two broad ways for artists to approach our work:

  • With the desire to make something both meaningful and pleasing, that has an aspect of beauty in an eternal sense. Its rightness in itself can even be its meaning. Or,
  • Needing somehow to make something disturbing, that is going to clash with that eternal rightness of what is beautiful. The message being, all is not right. I am not grateful for the status quo and I don’t want you to be, either.
    times square new york
    Photo by Evonics on Pexels.com

When I was a young New Yorker I remember going to performances with the very intent to be shocked by the boldness of the rebellion against common sensibility. And the more often my conscience was offended, the harder it became to shake me up. This — I think, nonsensically — passed for the urbane idea of what constitutes “art.”

Today this suburban girl who spent my twenties in New York and my thirties in La La Land has come full circle back to find that the need to be shocking and offensive has all but left me. A message can wake people up without horrifying them, by touching them in a positive way.

It comes down to kindness, gentleness, love and self-control. Most grown-ups have developed a taste for serenity and wisdom and appreciate the timeless rightness of true beauty that comes through true artists, not malcontents, as a gift from something eternally Good.

Think of what you are channeling with your art.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: